![]() What it does very often, is take away the quality of the piece and turn it into an attraction rather than a work of art. Again, these are the wrong reasons and it saddens me. We women, in this industry, receive a lot of pressure to be used as sexual objects either for the pleasure of the audience or for the one of the director/crew.īut if the nudity is part of a beautiful script and adds dimension to the film, then yes, I'll consider it.Īs for theatre, it seems there is more and more nudity for the chock value, to make sure that they'll sell tickets. I later heard many horror stories about this director, my instinct was right unfortunately. Needless to say I left and never came back. Last time I heard this argument, the director also told me that his wife understood that he needed to have a very close, special relationship with his lead actress, that it was necessary for the art of the film. People who say that you are not a great actor if you don't do nudity because a great actor has no inhibitions, are just putting pressure on female to remove their clothes for the wrong reasons. I totally agree with you Lee, unfortunately, very often, the nudity is there for many reasons that have nothing to do with the story or the acting. I would also hazard a guess that far larger numbers of male directors/producers see nudity as a 'necessary' element of 'cutting edge' work than female directors/producers do. Most female actors have much bigger issues - and I understand this - there is a much greater fear of being manipulated as a sex object, and a general feel that privacy is being invaded. I think by and large most male actors, if pushed, wouldn't have a massive problem with it. I have also argued that the attitude taken towards the issue of nudity does seem to vary depending on whether an actor is a man or a woman. I tend to think a lot of nudity gets thrown into drama for shock value, and shock value alone (either that, or sheer titillation), and, frankly, that's not a good enough justification for it in my book. ![]() Maybe in the past, a few would have gone nude in certain situations (battle, for instance) but not very many. But, realistically, how many times is someone nude in life? When they have a bath or shower, when they are in bed (sometimes), on holiday (maybe), in hospital, that's probably about it. “Just because I am in theater (not cabaret, but I do perform them every once in a while) does not mean that I am up for anything.I do find it a slightly odd thing that so much fuss is made about nudity as a sort of prerequisite for the 'uninhibited' seems to me that it's worth appearing nude if the script calls for it in order to make either a necessarily symbolic or a needfully naturalistic point. She wrote: “I probably need to clarify some information in this random article since people are reaching out to me like ‘girl, are you ok?’” This one had a musical cabaret background, so she was up for anything.”įollowing publication of the article, Hall herself posted a lengthy thread of Tweets in response. When it was suggested to him that intimacy coordinators are there to protect actresses in the wake of #MeToo, he replied: “I suppose it depends on the actress. In the same interview, Bean referenced TV show “Snowpiercer,” in which he and actress Lena Hall were involved in a suggestive scene. Our job as actors is to make it not look technical. Jameela Jamil, who plays the villain in Marvel’s upcoming “She-Hulk: Attorney at Law” TV series, responded to Bean’s comment on love scenes being a “technical exercise” by saying: “It should only be technical. 'Bridgerton's' intimacy coordinator's work not as sexy as you'd think ![]() LIAM DANIEL/NETFLIX © 2020 Liam Daniel/Netflix BRIDGERTON (L to R) REGE-JEAN PAGE as SIMON BASSET and PHOEBE DYNEVOR as DAPHNE BRIDGERTON in episode 102 of BRIDGERTON Cr.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |